Share this
LEARN Commission Final Report Calls for Less Bias, More Data When Evaluating Prior Learning
by Carlo Bertolini on Dec 18, 2025
The Learning Evaluation and Recognition for the Next Generation (LEARN) Commission has released its final report. Learning Evaluation for the 21st Century: Recommendations To Transform Policy and Practice To Meet Changing Needs urges higher ed practitioners to avoid a deficit-based mindset by embracing diverse learning experiences that have prepared students for further education.
When considering sources of potential credit, faculty and staff should ignore variables such as institution, accreditation type, or course modality and recency, all sources of potential bias, according to the report. Instead, credit decisions should be more broadly based on a minimum of 70% overlap in learning outcomes, relying on more data to continually improve accuracy and efficiency.
The LEARN Commission, a national partnership between the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO) and Sova, was formed in 2024. Its purpose is to support the inclusion of a broader range of postsecondary learning and bolster the policies and procedures that underpin its evaluation.
Dr. Beth Doyle, CAEL senior vice president of initiatives and solutions, is among the LEARN commissioners. The commission’s close alignment with CAEL’s mission is also evident in its nomenclature. The report stresses the commission’s preference of the phrase “learning evaluation” over the traditional “credit evaluation” to call attention to the importance of recognizing competencies gained outside of the classroom.
| Read more: | Beth Doyle coauthors op ed on credit mobility with fellow LEARN commissioners |
The learning evaluation process deserves such attention because it consumes heavy resources, is highly decentralized, and has a major impact on learner outcomes, according to the report. Echoing CAEL research, it warns that a failure to award credit for prior learning can add time and expenses to the pursuit of a degree, threatening completion.
Increasing transfer and other adult learner student populations, in contrast to high school cohorts projected to decline through 2041, add to the urgency of learning evaluation, the report asserts. However, it warns that learning evaluation processes are not prepared to capitalize on the opportunities these trends present.
| Read more: | CAEL white paper: CPL, transfer policy critical amid shifting enrollment trends |
The LEARN Commission focused on four aspects of learning evaluation important to learning ability: traditional transfer between institutions, high school dual enrollment, credit for prior learning, and applying AI and other technology to evaluation processes. In its report, the commission argues that a consistent protocol should prevail regardless of the source of learning under evaluation.
The commission identifies nine preeminent factors that define the learning evaluation landscape:
- High variability: Inconsistency among and within institutions adds to the complexity learners face.
- Manual processes: Learning evaluation entails a multistep, labor-intensive routine involving many faculty and staff.
- Diffused decision making: In the absence of a unified point of coordination, learners, faculty, and staff struggle to understand governing processes.
- Unclear faculty role: Faculty authority in learning evaluation varies in practice and perception.
- Few national standards: A lack of universal guidelines leaves learners and practitioners in the dark.
- Lack of transparency: Uncertainty is driving inconsistency and inefficiency in learning evaluation.
- Underdeveloped data and technology infrastructure: Complex efforts to crosswalk diverse learning experiences are not supported by properly developed data and technology infrastructure.
- Lack of focus on the end goal: As a result of limited data resources, systematic approaches for evaluating learner outcomes are lacking.
- Impact on learner experience: Learner experiences also vary greatly.
The report offers several recommendations for acting on these factors. Implementing them, it argues, can help higher ed reverse enrollment losses, better meet workforce needs, and support broader community prosperity.
The report is available on the ACCRAO website.
Share this
- Adult Learner Success (129)
- CAEL Members (104)
- Success Stories (94)
- Credit for Prior Learning (75)
- Workforce Development (75)
- Impact (70)
- Best Practices (68)
- Career Pathways Support (43)
- Strategic Partnerships (41)
- Work-based Learning (34)
- Trends in Higher Education (32)
- Curation (29)
- Upskilling and Reskilling (29)
- Q&A (23)
- Inclusion (22)
- Policy (21)
- Military-connected Learners (19)
- Talent Management (19)
- Research (18)
- Retention and Completion (18)
- Short-term Credentials (18)
- Adult Learner 360 (17)
- Enrollment (15)
- Student support (12)
- Transfer Students (12)
- Adult Learner Academy (10)
- Competency Based Education (CBE) (10)
- Education Benefits (10)
- In the news (9)
- Student Stories (9)
- Experiential Learning (8)
- Guest blog (8)
- HBCUs (8)
- NACTEL (7)
- Apprenticeships (6)
- Case Studies (6)
- EPCE (6)
- Featured (6)
- HSIs (6)
- Online Learning (6)
- Wraparound Support (6)
- Community colleges (5)
- Credit Predictor Pro (4)
- Future of work (4)
- COVID-19 (3)
- Comebackers (3)
- Structural Approaches to Learning (3)
- Tuition (3)
- Accelerated Program (2)
- Professional development (2)
- Student parents (2)
- Chambers of commerce (1)
- Skills-based hiring (1)
- Upcoming (1)
- December 2025 (2)
- November 2025 (6)
- October 2025 (6)
- September 2025 (13)
- August 2025 (5)
- July 2025 (5)
- June 2025 (11)
- May 2025 (8)
- April 2025 (8)
- March 2025 (8)
- February 2025 (8)
- January 2025 (5)
- December 2024 (5)
- November 2024 (4)
- October 2024 (8)
- September 2024 (7)
- August 2024 (10)
- July 2024 (9)
- June 2024 (8)
- May 2024 (11)
- April 2024 (5)
- March 2024 (7)
- February 2024 (5)
- January 2024 (7)
- December 2023 (10)
- November 2023 (7)
- October 2023 (3)
- September 2023 (4)
- August 2023 (3)
- July 2023 (5)
- June 2023 (8)
- May 2023 (9)
- April 2023 (5)
- March 2023 (6)
- February 2023 (5)
- January 2023 (3)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (7)
- October 2022 (7)
- September 2022 (6)
- August 2022 (6)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (6)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (5)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (4)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (8)
- September 2021 (4)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (6)
- May 2021 (5)
- April 2021 (9)
- March 2021 (8)
- February 2021 (5)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (4)
- November 2020 (3)
- October 2020 (6)
- September 2020 (2)
- August 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (2)
- February 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (3)
- December 2019 (2)
- July 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (1)
- October 2018 (4)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (1)
- July 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (2)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (5)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (8)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (5)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (6)
- February 2016 (9)
- January 2016 (4)
- January 2015 (2)
